Stating the Obvious

July 13, 2005

(And, oddly enough, in dry weather there’s none at all!)

“A truck driver was driving along on the freeway. A sign comes up that reads “low bridge ahead.” He tries to turn off but, before he knows it, the bridge is right there and he gets stuck under it. Cars are backed up for miles.

Finally, a police car comes up. The cop gets out of his car and walks around to the truck driver, puts his hands on his hips and says, “Got stuck huh?”

The truck driver says, “No, I was delivering this bridge and ran out of gas” ”

“If we don’t succeed, we run the risk of failure.”

….George W. Bush, Jr.

“As fulfilling as it is to make fun of people for stating the obvious, you should at least be aware that doing so properly can be (and is) an integral part of many noble endeavours. Most proofs in philosophy and mathematics start out by stating facts that are widely known/considered to be true (ie, obvious), both to lay the foundation for inferences later on, and to orient the reader to the writer’s progression of thought. You and I both know that an odd number n can be represented in the form 2k+1 (k an integer), but if I don’t come out and say so at the beginning of my proof, you’ll scratch your head when I tell you that n squared is 4k^2+4k+1. And you’ll either take longer to infer my meaning (reinventing the wheel in the process), or just lose interest. The Socratic method is structurally little more than stating the obvious and asking your pupil whether a series of seemingly obvious consequences do or do not follow logically.

But outside the realm of argument, stating the obvious is one of the most basic elements of small talk, which is almost always the first step towards having meaningful conversation with another human. Unfortunately, we can’t just walk up to strangers and ask them about their thoughts on the nature of the soul… it’s socially unaccepted, but for a good reason. Subjective issues (religion, politics, musical taste, etc) are the most touchy, and when conflict and disagreement erupt around them, people become upset. A new person you’re interested in starting a conversation with has no interest in getting into an argument with a stranger. Conversation based around deep thoughts and strong opinions and radical ideas doesn’t occur until after you’re fairly well acquainted with someone (unless you’re part of a society similar to E2). Prior to this, you’re confined to asking innocuous questions (”What’s your major?” and “Have you seen such-and-such movie?”, once you’ve been talking for a few minutes), and stating the obvious (”It’s a scorcher out here today” or “That’s a cool shirt”) to show that you’re willing to engage in verbal communication and exchange a little vulnerability for the possibility that the other will respond with something interesting (”Yeah, I was born in such-and-such, where the weather is…”, “Thanks, I bought it from NORML, which meets the first Tuesday of…”).” Source

i often use sarcasm when someone states the obvious or says something very expectable , like something was repeated so manytimes before.

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://sugarcubes.blogsome.com/2005/07/13/stating-the-obvious/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>